© 2024 Interlochen
CLASSICAL IPR | 88.7 FM Interlochen | 94.7 FM Traverse City | 88.5 FM Mackinaw City IPR NEWS | 91.5 FM Traverse City | 90.1 FM Harbor Springs/Petoskey | 89.7 FM Manistee/Ludington
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Misleading social media ads bash a rooftop solar bill. They’re backed by big utility companies.

Facebook Ad Library

 

Anyone scrolling Facebook in Michigan over the past week may have noticed ads attacking a new energy bill in the statehouse. 

The proposed legislation would allow more people to put solar panels on their homes or businesses. It gets rid of a cap limiting how many solar installations can connect to the grid.

 

Social media ads say the proposal caters to out-of-state energy developers and threatens a reliable power grid

 

One of the ads reads, “Don’t let out-of-state special interests do to Michigan what they did to Texas.”

 

Clean energy advocates say the ads are misleading.

 

“That is just a lie. That’s not what happened,” says Matt Kasper, the Research Director at the Energy & Policy Institute, who first wrote about the ads. “That’s really sad and really shameful.”

 

“It’s a combination of scare tactics and out-and-out lies,” adds John Freeman, the director of the Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association.

 

Utility experts have stressed that the legislation does not threaten the reliability of the grid. “We don’t need a system-wide cap,” said Dan Scripps, the head of the Michigan Public Service Commission, a non-partisan government agency that regulates public utilities. 

 

The 501(c)(4) organizations behind the ads are Alliance for Michigan Power and Citizens for Energizing Michigan’s Economy. The groups have strong financial ties to DTE Energy, and Consumers Energy, respectively, and share several executive staff members with the utility companies, according to public documents reviewed by Kasper.  

 

In past years, Consumers Energy has contributed over $40 million to Citizens for Energizing Michigan’s Economy, Kasper notes. 

 

He says the utility companies don’t want more people participating in rooftop solar programs because it eats into their profits. 

 

“They’re in the business of selling electricity and this [proposed legislation] prevents that. So of course they would not like it,” adds Tony Anderson, general manager at Cherryland Electric Cooperative, a utility provider that would not be affected by the bill. 

 

A representative from DTE Energy said the company could not speak for the Alliance for Michigan Power but is “in full support of solar and is investing heavily in solar projects.”

 

Consumers Energy did not provide a comment.

Lexi Krupp reports on science and the environment. Previously, she worked for Gimlet Media where she helped the Science Vs team distinguish what's fact from what's not. Her work has appeared in Audubon, Popular Science, VICE, and elsewhere.